Investigating different types of EFL teacher questions as a formative assessment tool

Andri Suherman

Abstract


This research article aimed to explore the types of questions deployed by EFL teachers as a formative assessment strategy. The participants in this case study were three Indonesian EFL teachers and twenty-four students. It investigated how these teachers posed questions to benefit learning, and analyzed how students responded to represent their real thinking. The research methods used were classroom observations and interviews. The findings revealed two main points; (1) the vast majority (over 70%) of convergent questions were posed by the teachers, followed by less than 20% of divergent questions and procedural questions, (2) individual answer and the choral answer made up the largest proportion (more than 40%), followed by a small minority (less than 10%) of no answer and teacher answer. The extent to which teacher questions benefited learning and in what way students' answers represented their real thinking was also discussed. The implications of this study were to provide practical insight to EFL teachers into how to develop questions as a formative assessment strategy and to inform EFL teachers with some suggestions to carry out effective questions to stimulate learners' real thinking.


Keywords


teacher questions, students answers, EFL teachers, formative assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Black, P., &Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,21(1): 5–31.

Chick, J. (1996). Safe-talk: collusion in apartheid education. In: Coleman H (ed.) Society and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hu, Q., Nicholson, A., & Chen, W. (2004).A survey on the questioning pattern of college English teachers. Foreign Language World,6: 22–27.

Leung, C., &Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom context: assessmentas discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing,21(3): 335–59.

Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.

Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing,18(4): 429–62.

Richards, J.C., &Lockhart, C. (1994).Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms.New York:Cambridge University Press.

Tsui, A. (1996).Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In: Bailey K, Nunan D (eds.)Voices from the Language Classrooms: Qualitative Research in Second Language Education.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wragg, E. C. (2001).Questioning in the Secondary School.London: Routledge


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Proceedings of International Conference on English Language Teaching (INACELT) is published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya Indonesia in collaboration with Journal on English as a Foreign Language.

Editor and Administration Address: 

Department of English Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and EducationInstitut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palangka Raya Indonesia, Jalan G. Obos Komplek Islamic Centre Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, Postal Code 73111, Email: inacelt@iain-palangkaraya.ac.id, Website: http://e-proceedings.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/inacelt




Flag aCounter